SOLID STORY, Mike Sherer. Really reminded me of something John Grisham would come up with.
This movie of yours is way better than the logline you provided; you should definately work on formulating a better logline...
The best parts of this story are:* Good plot points throughout. Balance of revealing evidence of the conspiracy and escalating tensions are very well thought out.
* Damien character really works, especially early on.
* Scenes end at the right time, before they start getting boring. What I'm trying to say is: you have good instincts for where to end you scenes, Mike.
Other good stuff:1) Description of Colin. "An evil looking gnome."
2) Jeff works as Marcus' sidekick.
3) Perfect balance of total number of major characters. Not so many that I couldn't keep track of them all. Not so few that the story lacked intrigue. IF you draft on, I suggest you just deepen what you've already got.
Form choice clarification sought:Having read a couple of your scripts now. One tripping point I have is in your line of descriptions you like the dash [ -- ] a lot. Why? What purpose does it serve? NOT knowing what purpose it serves I just pretended every time I saw [ -- ] I just mentally substituted a period, and pretended to be reading short sentences.
Areas for improvement1) Unbelievable action. Page 67 in a line of description: "Flames shoot out from the ignition -- burn Damien's hand."
2) Mis-formated change from an exterior location seen through a character's point-of-view to an interior location. Page 83 in script:
Jeff's POV: Marcus cross the street -- enters the
EMERALD LOUNGE
E.C. suggests:
Jeff watches Marcus cross the street... and enter through the main doors.
INT. EMERALD LOUNGE
3) Voice over narration cue needed. Page 41.
E.C. suggests:
KATIE (V.O.)
(off phone's receiver)
xxxxx
4) Moving shot not called out. Page 81.
E.C. suggests:
INT. BRIAN'S VAN (MOVING)
Why (MOVING)? Well-p, the van is moving, hence the scenery seen though the windows will appear to be moving.
5) Poor introduction of supporting characters. Page 29. I would definitely change how FIREPLUG and the other one of Colin's henchmen are introduced.
E.C. suggests:
Colin's two muscle-men step INTO VIEW from behind the Volkswagen. REDWOOD: tall and thick. FIREPLUG: short and stocky.
6a) Jarring, uncommon word, "idomitable." Page 36. YES, this is a valid word; it means incapable of being overcome. But idomitable is also a very uncommon word. I found it jarring; like what is he really saying. It's not funny. It's not cute. And I think you'd be better served choosing a different word or phrase.
6b) Ditto that with mustachio. Page 25. In a line of description:
Mustachioed bartender glares at Marcus -- walks off.
E.C. suggests:
A bartender with a fancy mustache glares at Marcus. Then walks off.
7) Poor choice of words. Page 29. Damien has just left the diner now appears outside, yet the first sentence in description is "Damien exits --" In script:
EXT. CUP-A-JOE DINER
Damien exits --
E.C. suggests:
Damien ARRIVES outside. Deep breath. Down come the designer shakes. A smile, as Damien's confidence returns.
Minor changes: mis-spelling, verb tense, mis-capitalizationPage 64: "your dishonorable discharge" not "you're dishonorable discharge." Page 66: "shortcomings" not "short comings." Page 73: "INT. DAMIEN'S OFFICE - DAY" not "INT.DAMIENS'S OFFICE - DAY. Page 82: "makes a U-turn" not "make a U-turn," "heads back to town" not "head back to town." Page 52: no need to capitalize Truth in lines of dialog, "Your duty is to the Truth."
All-in-all VERY GOOD job, sir. The Damien charter reminded me of Patrick Warburton, who plays Jeff Bigham of CBS' "Rules of Engagement." If I were you, he's a guy you might wanna approach, and try to get attached as an element. When reading this script, Patrick Warburton was really on my mind every time Damien spoke.
Thanks for the great read.
- E.C. Henry from Bonney Lake, WA