Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2010 18:35:13 GMT -5
Quick question.
If you are writing a scene that happens multiple locatations in a house (Kitchen, bathroom, living room, bedroom) and the characters are moving from one room to another, do you need a new slugline for each room? Wouldn't it read better if there was just a notation in the action?
INT. HOUSE - LIVING ROOM - NIGHT INT. HOUSE - KITCHEN - CONTINUOUS INT. HOUSE - BATHROOM - CONTINUOUS
or
INT. HOUSE - NIGHT.
Jeff moves from the foyer to the kitchen. Monica heads for the bathroom and Jeff blocks her path. Jeff sits on his bed.
or
INT. HOUSE - NIGHT LIVING ROOM
KITCHEN
BATHROOM
Which is the right way to do it? Most of the other scenes I have written are in a single place as opposed to many rooms. There is an argument in this scene so I don't want to slow the reader down. I want the action fast paced.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by openup on Aug 6, 2010 18:48:17 GMT -5
Hi! I've read, and seen, that the third way is the most correct one. Meaning: To me, that's reasonable enough, and the reader can follow easily. Because the house already is one location (the main location , let's say). The rest are "sub-locations". Only if I change the main location, I change slugline. If, for example, you got two houses, JOHN'S HOUSE, let's say, and MIKE'S HOUSE, and you jump from John's house, to Mike's bathroom, then I'd write: INT. MIKE'S HOUSE -- BATHROOM -- DAY, and if the action continues in Mike's house, the rest would just be KITCHEN, LIVING ROOM, etc (not entire suglines). This is just my opinion, but I hope it proves at least a bit useful...
|
|